data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45ffb/45ffbf8e3877175314598a051ac34203fe31b898" alt=""
“functionally heterosexual.” Would now be the time to call into question the use of our sexualities as a primary element in our identities? What’s the going logic on this amongst the Foucaultians and late night chat show hosts?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ee1b/4ee1ba0019b2d4209398295fa50eb1bfad469a47" alt=""
Nothing but a Generalized Insanity Blog™ and repository of random finds AKA Brain Dumps™. This is a CaseyPedia Approved corner of the CaseySphere and the Official Source of 6 Degrees of Casey Serin™. We are Project SCOBY Doo™ and we are purveyors of fine thongs, butt plugs, fishnets, Nietzsche, Fruit Loops™ and duck dongs for the likes of Nicole Richie and Paris Hilton among other well-established celubutards! A Shining example of how NOT to blog. I Am Aware of All Internet Traditions™
## |
US CO2 . . (cubic feet) |
2 comments:
Don't those mantis things kill after mating? How could that be functionally any-sexual unless you're a bug?
I'm happiest when totally flowy...
When I feel lustful I actually feel kinda masculine... hunter like... uhm... where am I going with this?
Love the pictures!!!
Post a Comment